<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MycoRant &#187; history</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mycorant.com/tag/history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mycorant.com</link>
	<description>What could possibly be better than a fungus study?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:57:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mycology at the New &#8220;Popular Science&#8221; Archive</title>
		<link>http://mycorant.com/mycology-at-the-new-popular-science-archive/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=mycology-at-the-new-popular-science-archive</link>
		<comments>http://mycorant.com/mycology-at-the-new-popular-science-archive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tid Bit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mycorant.com/?p=1779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In cooperation with Google, Popular Science magazine has placed all the content they have ever produced online and free for the browsing. According to the website: We&#8217;ve partnered with Google to offer our entire 137-year archive for free browsing. Each issue appears just as it did at its original time of publication, complete with period [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1786" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 375px"><a href="http://www.popsci.com/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1786" title="lrg_cover" src="http://mycorant.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/lrg_cover-222x300.jpg" alt="" width="365" height="492" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Cover of an early issue of Popular Science</p></div>
<p>In cooperation with Google, <a href="http://www.popsci.com/announcements/article/2010-03/new-browse-137-years-popsci-archive-free" target="_blank"><em>Popular Science</em></a> magazine has placed all the content they have ever produced online and free for the browsing. According to the website:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>We&#8217;ve partnered with Google to offer our entire 137-year archive for free browsing. Each issue appears just as it did at its original time of publication, complete with period advertisements. And today we&#8217;re excited to announce you can browse the full archive right here on PopSci.com.</em></p>
<p>This looks to be a great resource for historical as well as practical reasons. One of the comments at the site makes a good point:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>03/07/10 at 3:27 pm</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><!--paging_filter--></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>I love this! The articles about how to build things like tube radios and chemistry experiments and schematics on how things work. This is the example of how a magazine should be.</em></p>
<p>No doubt!</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Searching for Mycology at <em>Popular Science</em></strong></p>
<p>I wonder what kinds of interesting information on fungi shows up there? Better check it out. A search for &#8220;mushroom&#8221; returns 17 results, ranging in date from 1875 to 2000. There are articles about mushrooms books, fungal arts and crafts, mushroom growing&#8211;all sorts of things.  Take for example this gem,  from the July 1889 issue, Fungi by T. H. McBride, which begins:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>The fungi as a class may hardly be called popular. For various reasons they are, so to speak, under a cloud. They are little known, and so in lieu of better information, the legend &#8220;poison&#8221; seems to run for all the finer and more showy species. If not held absolutely poisonous, most are at least considered useless and are nameless.</em></p>
<p>It&#8217;s a wonderful and fun read.</p>
<p>There is plenty more to peruse. A search for &#8220;fungi&#8221; also returns 20 results. How about &#8220;mycology&#8221;? 14. Fungus? 20 again. That&#8217;s weird. I&#8217;m guessing that the results are limited to 20 per search. Well, the site does say that improvements are in the works. It really isn&#8217;t very convenient for scrolling through, but it&#8217;s very interesting and entertaining none-the-less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mycorant.com/mycology-at-the-new-popular-science-archive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
